Truth Be Damned ....
At U of Albany ... it's cover your ass time.
Or as Freeborn John puts it, When push comes to research dollars it's like living Kafka at Albany !
For your average run of the mill Warmist acolyte these people are off the radar ... but in the so called 'Scientific Consensus' ... Wei-Chyung Wang is oft quoted and his "work" offered as evidence of conclusive warming trends in China.
Doug Keenan ... a respected mathematician ... studied the Wang data and found it questionable.
He then researched the data sources and methodology and found it ... obviously fraudulent.
He informed the U of Albany (where Wang works) of his concerns and followed up with a formal complaint.
The UofA in turn stalled and proceeded to break their own formal rules for handling such serious complaints. In the mean time ... Wang received over $7 million of research funding from federal agencies to continue his ... ahem... work.
Now it seems to me that we have a person first perpetrating a scientific fraud then obtaining federal funding by presumably fraudulent means then a state funded institution looking like they are trying to cover up the fraud.
Now Freeborn John sees this as sureal....
I wonder what would be the response of mssrs John and Keenan to our HRCs?
I also wonder how grad students under the Wang umbrella like this situation.
My question is: When someone covers and protects a fraud ..... does that not in turn make them a fraud as well? And in the USA is that not also a set of fellonies? Felonies that would not only result in jail time and big fines ... but also being permanently disqualified from receiving any further funds?
OMMAG
Or as Freeborn John puts it, When push comes to research dollars it's like living Kafka at Albany !
For your average run of the mill Warmist acolyte these people are off the radar ... but in the so called 'Scientific Consensus' ... Wei-Chyung Wang is oft quoted and his "work" offered as evidence of conclusive warming trends in China.
Doug Keenan ... a respected mathematician ... studied the Wang data and found it questionable.
He then researched the data sources and methodology and found it ... obviously fraudulent.
He informed the U of Albany (where Wang works) of his concerns and followed up with a formal complaint.
The UofA in turn stalled and proceeded to break their own formal rules for handling such serious complaints. In the mean time ... Wang received over $7 million of research funding from federal agencies to continue his ... ahem... work.
Now it seems to me that we have a person first perpetrating a scientific fraud then obtaining federal funding by presumably fraudulent means then a state funded institution looking like they are trying to cover up the fraud.
Now Freeborn John sees this as sureal....
I wonder what would be the response of mssrs John and Keenan to our HRCs?
I also wonder how grad students under the Wang umbrella like this situation.
My question is: When someone covers and protects a fraud ..... does that not in turn make them a fraud as well? And in the USA is that not also a set of fellonies? Felonies that would not only result in jail time and big fines ... but also being permanently disqualified from receiving any further funds?
OMMAG
Labels: Asscovering, Education?, Flummery
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home